Page History: Digital object repository software
Compare Page Revisions
Page Revision: 2010/02/02 11:39
Digital Object Repository Software Quick Comparisonopen source? | GUI? | windows compatible? | parse METS? | handle batch uploads? | individual item uploads? | number of formats supported | are formats we use supported? |
Greenstone | | | | | | | |
ContentDM | | | | | | | |
Fedora Commons | | | | | | | |
DSpace | | | | | | | |
Greenstone
Top
ContentDM
- spec sheet:
Top
==Fedora Commons==
Capcity
"Store all types of content and its metadata," " Digital content of any type can be managed and maintained," Metadata about content in any format can be managed and maintained," "Scale to millions of objects,"
Interface/easy of use
"Metadata about content in any format can be managed and maintained"
"Web-based Administrator GUI (low-level object editing)"
Access to contect
"Access data via Web APIs (REST/SOAP)," "Provide RDF search (SPARQL)"
"Content Model Architecture (define "types" of objects by their content)"
" GSearch (fulltext) Search Service"
"Multiple, customer driven front-ends."
Security/stability issues
"Rebuilder Utility (for disaster recovery and data migration),"
"The entire repository can be rebuilt from the digital object and content files."
" JMS messaging (your apps can "listen" to repository events)"
"
OAI-PMH Provider Service"
*
Top
DSpace
Top